Cross-disciplinary efforts will resolve the scientific approach both to research and work according to Dr. Lawrence.
As we sift through our century’s problems, he said complex global solution finders must pull from both tool kits, science and social.
Universities need to encourage or cater to new overlaps of interests that may not traditionally go together, because the new twists and dynamics multi-disciplined people can offer, the more diverse and understanding the solutions will be.
Complexity and overlaps are key traits of the 21st century.
Lawrence’s lecture revolved around science and technology, and he said the scientific approach limits the abilities of these aspects. He confirmed my question that disconnect between art, science and communication is not unique to America. It’s a global issue.
This is not the only weakness in cross-disciplinary tactics, but there is also a lack of motivation to fuse these three.
Local problems must be identified to have global affects, but the power lies in the bulging population of youth who must learn to empower themselves to create jobs that would interweave their varied interests. Tackling local issues demands a creative approach, and no one is going to make them happen outside of the locale.
The energy and dynamic ways of thinking is within the younger generations who have been pushed through education and now wait jobless for something to come up.
There is a need to intertwine disciplines, forget boundaries and find solutions in the oddities. These experimentations are ideal for local efforts, because it results in immediate feedback, qualitative results and passionate organizers.
The need for communication to work with art and science (the basis of future solutions) is one dynamic to add to peace journalism. If artists and scientists find their overlap, there must be a recognition and publicity to show others how it can be both vibrant and successful.
It’s important to find stories that collaborate complex or unusual angles and sources to show the strength in cross-disciplinary news.
As we sift through our century’s problems, he said complex global solution finders must pull from both tool kits, science and social.
Universities need to encourage or cater to new overlaps of interests that may not traditionally go together, because the new twists and dynamics multi-disciplined people can offer, the more diverse and understanding the solutions will be.
Complexity and overlaps are key traits of the 21st century.
Lawrence’s lecture revolved around science and technology, and he said the scientific approach limits the abilities of these aspects. He confirmed my question that disconnect between art, science and communication is not unique to America. It’s a global issue.
This is not the only weakness in cross-disciplinary tactics, but there is also a lack of motivation to fuse these three.
Local problems must be identified to have global affects, but the power lies in the bulging population of youth who must learn to empower themselves to create jobs that would interweave their varied interests. Tackling local issues demands a creative approach, and no one is going to make them happen outside of the locale.
The energy and dynamic ways of thinking is within the younger generations who have been pushed through education and now wait jobless for something to come up.
There is a need to intertwine disciplines, forget boundaries and find solutions in the oddities. These experimentations are ideal for local efforts, because it results in immediate feedback, qualitative results and passionate organizers.
The need for communication to work with art and science (the basis of future solutions) is one dynamic to add to peace journalism. If artists and scientists find their overlap, there must be a recognition and publicity to show others how it can be both vibrant and successful.
It’s important to find stories that collaborate complex or unusual angles and sources to show the strength in cross-disciplinary news.