My spring research theory was peace journalists can build their networks within NGOs, so they find alternative and localized sources instead of the typical authoritative ones.
Though networking within NGOs could lead to a social agenda of reports they want you to cover, it could also act as a great launching point to immerse in communities and learn more of their way of thinking.
Then again, the social reports would not be a priority during a time of conflict, so I’m still convinced they are the primary source to work within.
What I have noticed between Morocco and Sri Lanka is the contrast of NGO networks in both countries. Moroccan NGOs were linked by interest, and the various organizers were connected due to their community leadership roles.
I have not witnessed any connections Sarvodaya has with other NGOs. I understand this is due to the vast expansion of their organization, however it makes me wonder if they overshadow any other existing groups.
When immersing in a conflict or post-conflict area, it is critical to examine the layout of NGOs in the country and understand how they connect, if at all, with one another.
Independent of networks, there is a certain passion NGO members are fueled by. Their work doesn’t appear taxing on their attitudes, because as Mimi Bradly said, “it’s not work if your heart’s in it.”
This energy is not only inspirational, but it can serve as a positive and supportive network of people who want their work recognized and published. They’re not used to being spotlighted, so there would be a conducive environment for the writer to work within when searching for angles and stories.
NGOs are also the backbone of societies when their governments are distracted by war efforts and defense. Working within their area would be a direct exposition to what is happening and who is being affected.
I have also learned that NGOs are more knowledgeable of what will work locally, so their insight would offer solutions tailored for particular areas.
Attempts to aid and support would prove more successful with this knowledge than if a large Western country projected their own methods of success to help development. It is not sustainable or unique to delicate cultures caught in conflict or change.
Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne, founder and president of Sarvodaya, said culture is different societies’ development of how to satisfy human needs. He explained these developments are also how social aspects change; there must be new approaches and ways of thinking.
Much like peace journalism is an alternative way of delivering the news, NGOs understand the need for a fresh method to make change happen. It’s a new game plan, an innovative angle.
Though networking within NGOs could lead to a social agenda of reports they want you to cover, it could also act as a great launching point to immerse in communities and learn more of their way of thinking.
Then again, the social reports would not be a priority during a time of conflict, so I’m still convinced they are the primary source to work within.
What I have noticed between Morocco and Sri Lanka is the contrast of NGO networks in both countries. Moroccan NGOs were linked by interest, and the various organizers were connected due to their community leadership roles.
I have not witnessed any connections Sarvodaya has with other NGOs. I understand this is due to the vast expansion of their organization, however it makes me wonder if they overshadow any other existing groups.
When immersing in a conflict or post-conflict area, it is critical to examine the layout of NGOs in the country and understand how they connect, if at all, with one another.
Independent of networks, there is a certain passion NGO members are fueled by. Their work doesn’t appear taxing on their attitudes, because as Mimi Bradly said, “it’s not work if your heart’s in it.”
This energy is not only inspirational, but it can serve as a positive and supportive network of people who want their work recognized and published. They’re not used to being spotlighted, so there would be a conducive environment for the writer to work within when searching for angles and stories.
NGOs are also the backbone of societies when their governments are distracted by war efforts and defense. Working within their area would be a direct exposition to what is happening and who is being affected.
I have also learned that NGOs are more knowledgeable of what will work locally, so their insight would offer solutions tailored for particular areas.
Attempts to aid and support would prove more successful with this knowledge than if a large Western country projected their own methods of success to help development. It is not sustainable or unique to delicate cultures caught in conflict or change.
Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne, founder and president of Sarvodaya, said culture is different societies’ development of how to satisfy human needs. He explained these developments are also how social aspects change; there must be new approaches and ways of thinking.
Much like peace journalism is an alternative way of delivering the news, NGOs understand the need for a fresh method to make change happen. It’s a new game plan, an innovative angle.
RSS Feed
